<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giving up on Birger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indie4k.com/archives/92/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indie4k.com/archives/92</link>
	<description>A blog about the technical, financial and creative aspects of HD and Ultra-HD independant filmmaking.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.indie4k.com/archives/92#comment-1696</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indie4k.com/?p=92#comment-1696</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Nikon mount would have been a bit awkward with rental clients. They're mostly comfortable with PL. The Birger's slick electronic controls were a selling point we could use to offset some of this -- make the case that it was a better solution, not just a cheaper one. A dumb Nikon mount doesn't really let us make that case, so we decided to stick with PL.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for maybe switching to the Birger mount (or other smart mount) in the future... well, now that we've got a fully shootable rig in-house, we're not in a huge hurry to find another solution. We're not taking the idea off the table, but we'll wait and see how things develop.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nikon mount would have been a bit awkward with rental clients. They&#8217;re mostly comfortable with PL. The Birger&#8217;s slick electronic controls were a selling point we could use to offset some of this &#8212; make the case that it was a better solution, not just a cheaper one. A dumb Nikon mount doesn&#8217;t really let us make that case, so we decided to stick with PL.</p>
<p>As for maybe switching to the Birger mount (or other smart mount) in the future&#8230; well, now that we&#8217;ve got a fully shootable rig in-house, we&#8217;re not in a huge hurry to find another solution. We&#8217;re not taking the idea off the table, but we&#8217;ll wait and see how things develop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modifoo</title>
		<link>http://www.indie4k.com/archives/92#comment-1668</link>
		<dc:creator>modifoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indie4k.com/?p=92#comment-1668</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I also had the feeling that Birger forgot that their biggest customer was indeed Red. It was awkward to realize that all Red/Birger communication was done on Reduser.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As of today, Red has - with a one week delay - received an evalutation unit, but without a description. If things go well, the Birger won´t void the warranty.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The drama continues...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;May I ask why you went for the Red zoom, and not a Nikon mount and some nikon still lenses?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now that you have used the Red zoom for a while, do you still think you´ll use still lenses once a Canon mount becomes available for the Red?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also had the feeling that Birger forgot that their biggest customer was indeed Red. It was awkward to realize that all Red/Birger communication was done on Reduser.</p>
<p>As of today, Red has - with a one week delay - received an evalutation unit, but without a description. If things go well, the Birger won´t void the warranty.</p>
<p>The drama continues&#8230;</p>
<p>May I ask why you went for the Red zoom, and not a Nikon mount and some nikon still lenses?</p>
<p>Now that you have used the Red zoom for a while, do you still think you´ll use still lenses once a Canon mount becomes available for the Red?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
