<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Archiving #2: tape vs. drives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indie4k.com/archives/7/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indie4k.com/archives/7</link>
	<description>A blog about the technical, financial and creative aspects of HD and Ultra-HD independant filmmaking.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Indie4K: Independent digital cinema beyond HD. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to store data #2: eSATA RAID</title>
		<link>http://www.indie4k.com/archives/7#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Indie4K: Independent digital cinema beyond HD. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to store data #2: eSATA RAID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indie4k.com/archives/7#comment-95</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] If we&#8217;re building a 2 TB array out of 500 GB drives, why do we want five of them, rather than four? Well, if you create a striped RAID across four drives, and any one of them fails, your data is toast. Even if you leave them as separate volumes, if any one of them fails, 1/4 of your data is toast. And, of course, you&#8217;re four times as likely to have a failure with four drives as with one. Sure, hopefully you&#8217;ve got everything backed up, but you could still lose a fair bit of work. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If we&#8217;re building a 2 TB array out of 500 GB drives, why do we want five of them, rather than four? Well, if you create a striped RAID across four drives, and any one of them fails, your data is toast. Even if you leave them as separate volumes, if any one of them fails, 1/4 of your data is toast. And, of course, you&#8217;re four times as likely to have a failure with four drives as with one. Sure, hopefully you&#8217;ve got everything backed up, but you could still lose a fair bit of work. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
