<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photo lenses vs. cine lenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indie4k.com/archives/37/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indie4k.com/archives/37</link>
	<description>A blog about the technical, financial and creative aspects of HD and Ultra-HD independant filmmaking.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Indie4K &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Birger&#8217;s lens mount &#38; the future of glass</title>
		<link>http://www.indie4k.com/archives/37#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Indie4K &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Birger&#8217;s lens mount &#38; the future of glass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 22:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indie4k.com/archives/37#comment-484</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] discussed some of the tradeoffs with cine vs. photo lenses before. So, why have we decided to go in this direction? Well, largely it&#8217;s just a cost/benefit [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussed some of the tradeoffs with cine vs. photo lenses before. So, why have we decided to go in this direction? Well, largely it&#8217;s just a cost/benefit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
