<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Red&#8217;s impact: starting small</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indie4k.com/archives/19/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indie4k.com/archives/19</link>
	<description>A blog about the technical, financial and creative aspects of HD and Ultra-HD independant filmmaking.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Indie4K: Independent digital cinema beyond HD. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Red&#8217;s impact: boutique production</title>
		<link>http://www.indie4k.com/archives/19#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Indie4K: Independent digital cinema beyond HD. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Red&#8217;s impact: boutique production</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 20:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indie4k.com/archives/19#comment-116</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] This is the second in a series of posts on how Red will be used in various market segments. The first post provided a brief introduction. This post will contrast the &#8220;boutique&#8221; production company model (which is essentially how I&#8217;ll be using Red) with the &#8220;break the bank&#8221; self-fundend filmmaker model of the past. The next will compare the &#8220;boutique&#8221; model with the owner-operator model. Then I&#8217;ll move into discussing higher budget usage of the camera. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is the second in a series of posts on how Red will be used in various market segments. The first post provided a brief introduction. This post will contrast the &#8220;boutique&#8221; production company model (which is essentially how I&#8217;ll be using Red) with the &#8220;break the bank&#8221; self-fundend filmmaker model of the past. The next will compare the &#8220;boutique&#8221; model with the owner-operator model. Then I&#8217;ll move into discussing higher budget usage of the camera. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Correia</title>
		<link>http://www.indie4k.com/archives/19#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Correia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indie4k.com/archives/19#comment-114</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am in the exact same boat as Clint.  I was looking to buy an HVX package, but budgeted out it was about 12,000 for everything I wanted.  Then I noticed the Red banner on DVXuser.com, did a little research and decided to wait.  As the pricing became evident it seemed to me to be a worthy risk for something that could put me in a different league in terms of options as a shooter.  I could not afford a varicam package, let alone a HDX900, but I could just about squeeze out a red camera, some glass and other accessories.  I have been shooting standard (DVX100) for a while, and the demand for HD has been exponential.  I think the "boutique" term Chris refers to is in fact pretty applicable to my situattion.  I will produce personal projects and shoot for my clients.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in the exact same boat as Clint.  I was looking to buy an HVX package, but budgeted out it was about 12,000 for everything I wanted.  Then I noticed the Red banner on DVXuser.com, did a little research and decided to wait.  As the pricing became evident it seemed to me to be a worthy risk for something that could put me in a different league in terms of options as a shooter.  I could not afford a varicam package, let alone a HDX900, but I could just about squeeze out a red camera, some glass and other accessories.  I have been shooting standard (DVX100) for a while, and the demand for HD has been exponential.  I think the &#8220;boutique&#8221; term Chris refers to is in fact pretty applicable to my situattion.  I will produce personal projects and shoot for my clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.indie4k.com/archives/19#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 03:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indie4k.com/archives/19#comment-113</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I'm getting Red One #351 because it will create beautiful images (if it doesn't I'll be taking that 110% refund) and because I can (barely) afford it. I'm a story teller and this camera will allow me to tell those stories better. I really hope that it will allow me to create media that I can sell... but if not then it will still be beautiful and I won't have paid out the cost of an average 2500 square foot house... just an entry level sports car.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe I'll be kicking myself when the 2009 Camaro convertible shows up but that is the story of Clint.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting Red One #351 because it will create beautiful images (if it doesn&#8217;t I&#8217;ll be taking that 110% refund) and because I can (barely) afford it. I&#8217;m a story teller and this camera will allow me to tell those stories better. I really hope that it will allow me to create media that I can sell&#8230; but if not then it will still be beautiful and I won&#8217;t have paid out the cost of an average 2500 square foot house&#8230; just an entry level sports car.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;ll be kicking myself when the 2009 Camaro convertible shows up but that is the story of Clint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
