<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZFS in OS X Leopard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indie4k.com/archives/11/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indie4k.com/archives/11</link>
	<description>A blog about the technical, financial and creative aspects of HD and Ultra-HD independant filmmaking.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Indie4K: Independent digital cinema beyond HD. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Leopard Fallout</title>
		<link>http://www.indie4k.com/archives/11#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Indie4K: Independent digital cinema beyond HD. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Leopard Fallout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indie4k.com/archives/11#comment-118</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Of the announced features of Leopard, the only really significant one for our market is ZFS, for reasons I&#8217;ve discussed in the past. While it certainly would be great, though, it&#8217;s by no means necessary. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of the announced features of Leopard, the only really significant one for our market is ZFS, for reasons I&#8217;ve discussed in the past. While it certainly would be great, though, it&#8217;s by no means necessary. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Felter</title>
		<link>http://www.indie4k.com/archives/11#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Felter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indie4k.com/archives/11#comment-117</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Pools are flexible; if you create a pool spanning four drives and need to add a fifth drive, you can do that without having to recreate any of the file systems in the pool.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This isn't quite so flexible; if you are using RAID-Z you have to add a whole stripe (e.g. 4 more disks) at a time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;You can even remove a drive from a pool, assuming thereÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s enough space to store all the data without it. With a simple command, ZFS will rearrange your data so the drive you specify is no longer necessary, after which it can be removed.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This feature (zpool remove) is planned but not implemented yet.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(Let's hope WordPress doesn't eat my formatting.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Pools are flexible; if you create a pool spanning four drives and need to add a fifth drive, you can do that without having to recreate any of the file systems in the pool.</i></p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t quite so flexible; if you are using RAID-Z you have to add a whole stripe (e.g. 4 more disks) at a time.</p>
<p><i>You can even remove a drive from a pool, assuming thereÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s enough space to store all the data without it. With a simple command, ZFS will rearrange your data so the drive you specify is no longer necessary, after which it can be removed.</i></p>
<p>This feature (zpool remove) is planned but not implemented yet.</p>
<p>(Let&#8217;s hope WordPress doesn&#8217;t eat my formatting.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indie4K: Independent digital cinema beyond HD. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to store data #3: eSATA RAID continued</title>
		<link>http://www.indie4k.com/archives/11#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Indie4K: Independent digital cinema beyond HD. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to store data #3: eSATA RAID continued</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indie4k.com/archives/11#comment-99</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] How do you create a volume across multiple drives that makes use of distributed parity (see previous post) without shelling out big money for an enterprise storage system? Windows XP Pro have built-in software RAID 5 support, which which will do nicely. Mac OS X Leopard will have ZFS, which will to really nicely, creating a RAID Z storage pool. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How do you create a volume across multiple drives that makes use of distributed parity (see previous post) without shelling out big money for an enterprise storage system? Windows XP Pro have built-in software RAID 5 support, which which will do nicely. Mac OS X Leopard will have ZFS, which will to really nicely, creating a RAID Z storage pool. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
